Ok, stiamo parlando di cyber-attacco


Nemmeno il tempo di scrivere il post precedente e mi imbatto in questo articolo di Wired:

Future of Cyber Security: What Are the Rules of Engagement?

[…] there are numerous questions — ethical, legal and even bureaucratic — that need to be sorted out about the rules of engagement before the U.S. launches any cyber volleys in retaliation for an attack or otherwise. The most basic being, what constitutes an attack, how do we identify its source and what’s an acceptable response?

In a battle where the militarized zone exists solely in the ether(net) […] how do we fight, let alone find, the enemy? […]

And how do we know if the anonymous cyberwarrior attacking us is a soldier from the Red Army or just a Jolt-guzzling teen in his mother’s basement.[…]

Should the U.S. take action against a band of student hackers in China suspected of working for their government if Chinese authorities deny responsibility for their aggression?

Furthermore, if computers running NASDAQ trades are brought to a halt in a cyber attack, is that a criminal offense for the FBI to investigate or a national security incident worthy of a counterstrike?

E poi c’è la storia del team di brillanti ingegneri informatici che utilizzano, per primi, il nuovo algoritmo crittografico MD6. Poi si scropre che MD6 ha una falla, ma i bravi ingegneri lavorano sodo e creano una patch per la loro applicazione Windows, che quindi è pronta per diferendersi dagli attacchi informatici.

Peccato che questa applicazione si chiami Conficker.

Advertisements

Comments are closed.